IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Dissenso collettivo e razionalità individuali nelle relazioni industriali italiane. Il decentramento contrattuale nella prospettiva degli accordi interconfederali del 2011-14

Listed author(s):
  • Faioli Michele
Registered author(s):

    I protocolli/accordi interconfederali 2011-14 stanno gradualmente configurando le regole per la gestione del dissenso nell'ambito delle relazioni industriali italiane. Il dissenso, in questa prospettiva,è colto nelle dinamiche nazionali e in quelle aziendali/territoriali. A quest'ultimo riguardo si osserva la gestione della complessa dinamica che caratterizza le vicende giuridiche della contrattazione articolata, con gli effetti diretti sul modello di decentramento contrattuale che viene a determinarsi in azienda o in territori, geograficamente definiti, in relazione a (ulteriori) flessibilità da applicare ai contratti individuali di lavoro.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Carocci editore in its journal Economia & lavoro.

    Volume (Year): (2014)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 7-22

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:caq:j950ix:doi:10.7384/76598:y:2014:i:1:p:7-22
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caq:j950ix:doi:10.7384/76598:y:2014:i:1:p:7-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ()

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.