IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Historical Writing in the People's Republic of China since 1978


  • Zhang Xupeng


The December 1978 decision at the Third Plenary Session of the Eleventh Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party to implement reform and opening-up marks an important watershed in historical studies in contemporary China. With this in mind, historical studies in contemporary China can be conveniently subdivided into three periods: the period from the founding of the People’s Republic of China to the start of the Cultural Revolution (1949- 1966); the Cultural Revolution period (1966-1976); and the period starting with reform and opening-up, or the “new period” (1978 onwards). This paper gives a comprehensive survey on the historical writing in the People’s Republic of China since 1978. The paper has three parts. The first part is about how and why Chinese historians turn away from traditional political history to cultural and social histories. The second part analyses four paradigms in contemporary historical research in China: revolutionary history paradigm, modernization paradigm, postmodern paradigm, and global history paradigm. The third part reviews World History studies in China and lists four methods that have successively been employed, namely, the total/integral history, modernization history, the history of civilizational exchange, and global history. The paper concludes that it is incumbent on Chinese historians to be sensitive to all foreign historiographies while steadfastly adhering to the best Chinese traditions, for only in this way can a unique and worthy model of Chinese historiography emerge.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang Xupeng, 2013. "Historical Writing in the People's Republic of China since 1978," Revue Tiers-Monde, Armand Colin, vol. 0(4), pages 89-110.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:rtmarc:rtm_216_0089

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rtmarc:rtm_216_0089. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.