Établir des priorités en soins de santé. Comment passer des besoins vitaux aux taux de remboursement ?
Choice is part of human life, but when it concerns collective goods such as healthcare, and when budgets are restricted, choice is in an important sense irreducibly ethical. We propose an approach which employs the ethical concept of vital need to decisions about the ‘health basket’. Vital needs must be met if individuals are to avoid the ‘serious harm’ of diminished capacity as agents (‘agentive power’). We provide a critique of the majority of the key variables used to determine different forms of equity that are proposed in the literature. We then consider the ethical questions raised by healthcare priority-setting. These decisions must take into account social preferences to be legitimated. The procedure through which these preferences are expressed can be improved if what we term ‘informational care’ is respected.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): LIII (2014)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.cairn.info/revue-reflets-et-perspectives-de-la-vie-economique.htm|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_534_0011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.