IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Établir des priorités en soins de santé. Comment passer des besoins vitaux aux taux de remboursement ?

Listed author(s):
  • Christian Léonard
  • Philippe Batifoulier
  • Louise Braddock
  • John Latsis

Choice is part of human life, but when it concerns collective goods such as healthcare, and when budgets are restricted, choice is in an important sense irreducibly ethical. We propose an approach which employs the ethical concept of vital need to decisions about the ‘health basket’. Vital needs must be met if individuals are to avoid the ‘serious harm’ of diminished capacity as agents (‘agentive power’). We provide a critique of the majority of the key variables used to determine different forms of equity that are proposed in the literature. We then consider the ethical questions raised by healthcare priority-setting. These decisions must take into account social preferences to be legitimated. The procedure through which these preferences are expressed can be improved if what we term ‘informational care’ is respected.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: restricted

File URL:
Download Restriction: restricted

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique.

Volume (Year): LIII (2014)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
Pages: 11-33

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_534_0011
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_534_0011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.