IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Le paradoxe de l'État d'investissement social : pourquoi la pauvreté n'a-t-elle pas baissé ?


  • Bea Cantillon
  • Wim Van Lancker


In the past decades, social conditions were favourable in the rich welfare states of the West. Employment and incomes were on the rise and social spending remained high while passive welfare states were progressively transformed into so-called ‘investment states’ accompanied by an increasing policy focus on social inclusion and equal opportunities. Despite these favourable conditions, however, contemporary welfare states did not succeed in reducing poverty and inequality. What lies beneath the disquieting poverty standstill and how did welfare states miss this ‘window of opportunity’? In this article, we aim to shed more light on this question. We identify three structural trends behind the poverty standstill. First, work-rich households benefited most of rising employment rates while this has only been partially the case for the vulnerable workless households. Second, income protection for the working-age population out of work has become less adequate. Third, social spending for policies accommodating new social risks is primarily allocated towards higher income groups. Our analysis should not be read as a unilateral critique on the idea of the social investment state, but puts forward the hypothesis that social spending and, more generally, social redistribution in the social investment state have become less pro-poor. JEL: I32, I38, O52

Suggested Citation

  • Bea Cantillon & Wim Van Lancker, 2011. "Le paradoxe de l'État d'investissement social : pourquoi la pauvreté n'a-t-elle pas baissé ?," Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(4), pages 55-73.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_504_0055

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    More about this item


    welfare state; poverty; inequality; new social risks; labour market; income protection;

    JEL classification:

    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • O52 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Europe


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_504_0055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.