IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Budgets That Are More Pro-Poor and Pro-Growth

Listed author(s):
  • Sanjeev Gupta
  • Mark Plant
  • Benedict Clements
  • Thomas Dorsey
  • Emanuele Baldacci
  • Gabriela Inchauste
  • Shamsuddin Tareq
  • Nita Thacker

The paper addresses one of the key features and expectations of the PRGF: are budgets more pro-poor and pro-growth? Relying on abundant data gathered from numerous countries, the authors show that indeed the composition of both budgeted and actual public spending is shifting towards poverty-reducing activities in countries with a PRGF program. In particular, the paper shows that countries are allocating more to education and health care in their budget and that actual outlays in these sectors have also increased. The paper also makes the case for increased flexibility in accommodating higher spending when unexpected foreign aid becomes available.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique.

Volume (Year): XLII (2003)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 45-55

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_422_0045
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:rpvedb:rpve_422_0045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.