IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/riddbu/ride_313_0109.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Est-il pertinent de durcir le droit européen de l’environnement ?

Author

Listed:
  • Béatrice Boyer-Allirol
  • Elena Barbu

Abstract

Since January 1, 2017, Directive 2014/95/EU has required European listed firms, banks, and insurance companies with more than five hundred employees to publish information about their environmental impacts. In this context, we question the need for a strengthened European environmental law. To achieve this, we firstly analyze the regulatory frameworks of all European countries before Directive 2014/95/EU, in order to divide countries into three categories: (1) countries with hard law, which publish a coercive law of environmental reporting, (2) countries with soft law, which propose guidelines or codes of conduct emanating from government bodies; and (3) countries with flexible law, which have neither regulations nor recommendations on behalf of the state, but do have sporadic professional initiatives. We then select one country from each of these categories (France, Germany, and Italy) and, using different statistical methods, compare the impact of the regulatory framework on the level of environmental disclosure of companies. The results show the beneficial effects of mandatory regulations. Indeed, the environmental disclosures of French companies regulated by hard law are superior to those of German companies subjected to soft law or to those of Italian companies with flexible law. We can therefore conclude that it would be beneficial to strengthen environmental law in Europe.

Suggested Citation

  • Béatrice Boyer-Allirol & Elena Barbu, 2017. "Est-il pertinent de durcir le droit européen de l’environnement ?," Revue internationale de droit économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 109-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_313_0109
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=RIDE_313_0109
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-economique-2017-3-page-109.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_313_0109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-droit-economique.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.