IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chronique commentée des décisions de l'Organe de Règlement des Différends (juin 2010-novembre 2011)


  • Guillaume Busseuil
  • Jean-Marie Garinot
  • Stéphanie Grayot-Dirx
  • Clotilde Jourdain-Fortier
  • Isabelle Moine-Dupuis


Further to our previous reports, this year’s dispute cases at the WTO Dispute Settlement Body permit us to observe and to try to estimate connections between liberalization of international trade and non-trade values. Non-trade values or economic interests ? Complainants who refer to such values (public health, environment...) frequently are suspected – sometimes rightly – to do so in order to protect their national market (cf. for instance China – Raw Materials or United States – Clove Cigarettes). To present a case with convincing arguments is of an essential importance. In this respect, procedural matters are of an increasing importance – as is the role of the panels. Therefore, these matters hold a significant part in the present review. Several Agreements were invoked by complainants : most frequently the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (the GATT of 1994), but also the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBC) and the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures (SCM). Lastly, we can note for how much time some cases last (Australia – Apples from New Zealand, started in 2007 and now seems to have come to an end, or European Communities – Large Civil Aircraft, initiated with Airbus’s plaint in 2004).

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Busseuil & Jean-Marie Garinot & Stéphanie Grayot-Dirx & Clotilde Jourdain-Fortier & Isabelle Moine-Dupuis, 2012. "Chronique commentée des décisions de l'Organe de Règlement des Différends (juin 2010-novembre 2011)," Revue internationale de droit économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 161-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_256_0161

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_256_0161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.