IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Le droit d'auteur contre l'accès à l'information mondiale ?. Le cas des moteurs de recherche

Listed author(s):
  • Cédric Manara
Registered author(s):

    The web is a gigantic space with one trillion webpages. In such a space where it is critical to find information, search tools offer internet users a way to dig into most of the available online materials. In order to provide their services, search engines need to process information from third websites (which can choose not to be included in search index, though they rarely do so). As such, the search tools’ core activity comes into contradiction with intellectual property provisions according to which unauthorized copies or displays of information subject to copyright are unlawful. In the USA, search tools operations have been under scrutiny of courts, which have ruled that they may pursue their activities. In other countries (India, Japan), legislators have created a copyright exception in favor of search engines. In the European Union, there is no general liability exemption that would benefit search engines in the EC Directive on electronic commerce. Courts of Belgium, France, England, Germany, Italy and Spain have had to decide whether or not indexing by search engines complied with local copyright laws, and issued strikingly diverging opinions. As certain aspects of copyright in the information society have been harmonized in 2001 in the EU, one would not have expected to hear dissonant judicial voices in this field. Decisions span from strict application of copyright regime and heavy sanctions against search tools to references to foreign law to exclude the application of local rules and conclude that a search tool is immune from copyright liability. The comparative analysis of these decisions shows that courts are not at ease applying copyright rules to search tools practices. Both the assessment of the grounds of these rulings, and the study of other legal provisions under which the practices of search tools can be looked at, do not allow to conclude that search tools operate with legal certainty. Such a situation is not satisfactory, as it directly or indirectly jeopardizes access to information to internet users worldwide. For the information society to run smoothly, and given the social and economic role of search tools as internet intermediaries, there should be a legal safeguard for their operations. The article concludes that a legislative change is as justified as necessary.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Revue internationale de droit économique.

    Volume (Year): t.XXV (2011)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 143-164

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_252_0143
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_252_0143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.