IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Chronique de jurisprudence. Chronique des décisions de l'Organe de Règlement des Différends (ORD), août 2009-novembre 2010

Listed author(s):
  • Guillaume Busseuil
  • Jean-Marie Garinot
  • Clotilde Jourdain-Fortier
  • Isabelle Moine-Dupuis
Registered author(s):

    The WTO dispute settlement body’s decisions provide an opportunity to bring to light the difficulties reconciling the market principles and non trade values in international trade law. The first two decisions, which involve the SPS Agreement, and also the GATT Agreement, deal respectively with matters related to biosecurity and the protection of health. As to the third decision, it is relative to the publications and audiovisual entertainment products. Finally, the fourth decision concerns the Agreement on Information technologies, mechanism of tariff reduction – although integrated in GATT – on numeric products. The first decision deals with the old opposition of Australia to authorize the importation of apples from New Zealand for biosecurity reasons. The panel report ruled against Australia for not having based its measure on a proper risk assessment, according to the SPS Agreement. The second decision involves the United States which had established a standstill agreement on poultry coming from China : following sanitary problems which were rather alarming, usual but nevertheless rigorous procedures of inspection did not appear to guarantee the level of protection considered as necessary. The United States are blamed by the panel report for this regulation, which is considered not to be in accordance with many of the SPS Agreement prescriptions. In addition, the difficult issue of the interface between this agreement and the GATT one is conveniently raised. The answer is however far from exhausting the debate in our opinion. The third decision on audiovisual entertainment products involves one more time China, whose policy in preferential national treatment is considered to be in contradiction with its commitments under the GATT Agreement. This case offers an opportunity to develop a reflection on a particular kind of goods : the cultural objects. The last decision condemns the European Communities for their taxation on flat TV screens in violation of the Information Technology Agreement (ITA).

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Revue internationale de droit économique.

    Volume (Year): t.XXIV (2010)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 475-518

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_244_0475
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_244_0475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.