IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

L'agenda de l'OMPI pour le développement : vers une réforme de la propriété intellectuelle ?

Listed author(s):
  • Tonssira Myriam Sanou
Registered author(s):

    This paper aims at examining the contents and the range of an initiative undertaken by Brazil, Argentina and other developing countries in order to reform the international system of intellectual property. The attempts of developing countries to take into account their specific needs in the evolution of the rules of intellectual property go back to their accession to independence. These actions aim at obtaining more flexibilities in the development and the application of the rules of intellectual property, to facilitate the transfer of technologies from the North to the South as well as to ensure the access to information to their populations. The WIPO Development Agenda falls under the same logic. Indeed, in 2002, Brazil and Argentina submitted to the General Assembly of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) a plan of action for the installation of an Agenda for their development. Contrary to the preceding initiatives, this calendar aims at reforming the structure of the organization and at redirecting its ambitions and objectives towards the taking into account of the specific needs of developing countries. A striking fact of this action is the massive support brought to the countries of the South by the non-governmental organizations of public interest. At the conclusion of the examination of the proposals of the various States on the implementation of this Agenda, the General Assembly adopted forty five (45) recommendations in 2007 and created a Standing Committee in charge of their implementation. The five groups of recommendations relate to : Technical Assistance and Capacity Building (A), Norm-Setting, Flexibilities, Public Policy and Public Domain (B), Technology Transfer, Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and Access to Knowledge (C), Assessment, Evaluation and Impact Studies (D), Institutional Matters including Mandate and Governance (E). These recommendations turn around the same idea : to include the dimension of development in the operation of WIPO and in its activities of technical assistance and development of rules. They advocate the access to knowledge, namely through the technologies of communication and information, the use and safeguarding of the flexibilities envisaged by international conventions, and the safeguarding of the public domain.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Revue internationale de droit économique.

    Volume (Year): t. XXIII, 2 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 175-218

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_232_0175
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_232_0175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.