IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

La prise en considération de critères « extraconcurrentiels » dans le droit communautaire de la concurrence

Listed author(s):
  • Arthur Dyevre
Registered author(s):

    This article examines whether and to what extent the EC Treaty and the Merger Regulation allow the Commission and other competition watchdogs to take into account objectives and considerations other than competition-maximising goals when they apply and enforce EU competition rules. It tries to show how EU law solves the conflicts likely to arise between these rules and the various policies of the EU. Its main thesis is that EU law leaves some room for goals other than competition-maximising ends. Under EU law these goals may play a role in the application of competition rules. The Treaty and the Merger Regulation, however, severely restrict the role of these considerations. Reflecting the liberal orientation of the European economic Constitution, competition, under EU law, is the rule and non competition the exception. In the context of EU law, the article argues, competition is essentially understood – as it was by the Austrian School of Economics – in terms of economic freedom and market power. Maintaining competition on a given market is thus mainly about preventing undertakings to acquire market power or to use already acquired market power to make gains they could not make if they did not have such a market power. The emphasis is on the freedom to buy or sell goods and services without coercion by a market-power holding supplier. This means that any other goal, including economic efficiency, is outside the scope of competition policy. The EC Treaty does allow the regulators to take into account the various policy-objectives it enumerates and assigns to the EU when they decide whether an agreement, a merger, a market behaviour, or a state aid should be forbidden. Yet, as the article shows, the Treaty only permits a limited accommodation of the objectives – such as environmental protection, regional and social cohesion, or economic efficiency – likely to conflict with the pursuit of market freedom within the application of the competition rules. Article 81, paragraph 3, gives substantial discretion to the Commission and Member State regulators to exempt agreements found to violate article 81, paragraph 1. This avenue, however, may only be used if the agreement under consideration does preserve market freedom for a substantial part of the relevant market. What is more, EU competition law is even stricter when it comes to market behaviour and market structure. Mergers, whatever their contribution to economic efficiency or technological progress might be, cannot escape prohibition if they are found to create a dominant position. Likewise, there is no escape road for companies already commanding a dominant position once established they have behaved in a way inconsistent with article 82. Article 86, paragraph 2, provides for a very limited exception to these prohibitions, in case an undertaking has been assigned the task of providing a service of general economic interest. Finally, although the rules regarding state aid appear, at least on paper, more open to extra-competition goals, the Commission has consistently privileged competition over other considerations in practice. The article concludes on a tentative prediction about the future shape of EU competition law.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Revue internationale de droit économique.

    Volume (Year): t. XXI, 4 (2007)
    Issue (Month): 4 ()
    Pages: 415-440

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_214_0415
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_214_0415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.