IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

La dualité égalité – équité dans la pratique des autorités de régulation


  • Frédéric Jappont


This article aims at contributing to the debate on regulation. Despite its various meanings, the concept has indeed evolved considerably. It seems, however, that some agreement has emerged to the effect that regulation can be regarded as an approach which allows maintaining some balance between competition and other public interests. Independent agencies play a central role and are therefore subject to numerous constraints. The complex legal environment in which they act imposes some limits and restricts their behaviour as well as their decisions. Such environment has thus given rise to adapted responses which have allowed them to keep their unique role and autonomy, with a view of ensuring coherent action. This study aims at explaining the various legal principles which currently emerge from independent regulatory authorities’ practice. The principle of equality appears, in particular, as a principle cutting across all areas. The study shows that regulatory authorities do refer to this principle on various markets in order to promote equality of chances within competition and to sanction non-compliance. The study concludes that considerations of equity also gradually influence the decisions of regulatory agencies, which reinforces the idea that there cannot exist any efficient competition without some form of distributive justice and consideration of moral values.

Suggested Citation

  • Frédéric Jappont, 2006. "La dualité égalité – équité dans la pratique des autorités de régulation," Revue internationale de droit économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 151-165.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_202_0151

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_202_0151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.