IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Le contrat de partenariat constitue-t-il une private finance initiative à la française ?. Le périmètre du recours aux contrats de partenariat à l'aune de l'expérience britannique

Listed author(s):
  • Frédéric Marty
  • Arnaud Voisin

In June 2004, France adopted a new PPP contract known as the contrat de partenariat. Most features of this new procurement method have been drawn out from the best practices of the British Private Finance Initiative (PFI) policy. Firstly, long-term service contracts with performance-related payments were introduced into the French procurement system. Secondly, the decision to enter into such a transaction needs to be justified both in value for money terms and in legal terms (depending on the contingency requirements (urgency) or complexity of the project). Finally, government projects are required to seek clearance from an advisory body responsible for scrutinising the appraisal process. However, whilst PFI covers a vast array of transactions, ranging from concessions to long-term leases, the new French contract is implemented in the general legal environment applicable to existing alternative forms of PPP. A statistical study of contracts signed since 1987 has been carried out using available data relating to the British PPP, and then procurement methods applied to French projects within the French legal framework have been examined and compared with British projects. This article aims to determine the prospects of development of the contrat de partenariat through this comparison of British and French PPP’s. The final results of this analysis leads us to conclude that this new PPP would only be applicable to a limited number or specific types of projects. However, the mandatory value for money testing, which is not required for concessions and alternative forms of PPP, should favour the development of these contracts by obliging the awarding authority to make comparisons of efficiency with alternative procurement methods.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

File URL:
Download Restriction: free

Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Revue internationale de droit économique.

Volume (Year): t. XX, 2 (2006)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
Pages: 131-150

in new window

Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_202_0131
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_202_0131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.