IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Collectif ou collusif ?. A propos de l'application du droit des ententes aux certifications officielles de qualité

Listed author(s):
  • Emmanuel Raynaud
  • Egizio Valceschini
Registered author(s):

    In several agrifood sectors in Europe, firms and producers’ organizations involved in quality labelling based on official certification have been repeatedly criticized or even condemned by antitrust authorities for anti-competitive practices. This raises the question of the compatibility between quality policy for agrifood products as developed in Europe and antitrust. Should we consider that the only or main aim of the collective organizations managing these public labels is to mitigate actual and/or potential competition ? This article sheds some lights on this issue through a detailed analysis of a particular public label in France (« red label») largely used in poultry industry. We criticize the economic analysis made by the antitrust authorities and suggest an alternative explanation. In particular, we argue that, individual firms involved in these collective systems try to organize themselves in order to mitigate the costs related to the management of quality all along the vertical chain. We also show that the market governance is unable to promote and enforce products’ quality and the credibility of the label. The main reason is that this governance structure is unable to mitigate the contractual hazards related to collective and public labelling. We conclude by suggesting that the analysis developed by the antitrust authorities is misleading, generates a wrong assessment of the rationale behind the collective organization governing public labels and, more importantly, may reduce the incentives of private agents to invest in collective labelling.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Revue internationale de droit économique.

    Volume (Year): t. XIX, 2 (2005)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 165-195

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_192_0165
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_192_0165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.