IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collectif ou collusif ?. A propos de l'application du droit des ententes aux certifications officielles de qualité


  • Emmanuel Raynaud
  • Egizio Valceschini


In several agrifood sectors in Europe, firms and producers’ organizations involved in quality labelling based on official certification have been repeatedly criticized or even condemned by antitrust authorities for anti-competitive practices. This raises the question of the compatibility between quality policy for agrifood products as developed in Europe and antitrust. Should we consider that the only or main aim of the collective organizations managing these public labels is to mitigate actual and/or potential competition ? This article sheds some lights on this issue through a detailed analysis of a particular public label in France (« red label») largely used in poultry industry. We criticize the economic analysis made by the antitrust authorities and suggest an alternative explanation. In particular, we argue that, individual firms involved in these collective systems try to organize themselves in order to mitigate the costs related to the management of quality all along the vertical chain. We also show that the market governance is unable to promote and enforce products’ quality and the credibility of the label. The main reason is that this governance structure is unable to mitigate the contractual hazards related to collective and public labelling. We conclude by suggesting that the analysis developed by the antitrust authorities is misleading, generates a wrong assessment of the rationale behind the collective organization governing public labels and, more importantly, may reduce the incentives of private agents to invest in collective labelling.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Raynaud & Egizio Valceschini, 2005. "Collectif ou collusif ?. A propos de l'application du droit des ententes aux certifications officielles de qualité," Revue internationale de droit économique, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 165-195.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_192_0165

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_192_0165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.