IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Le déficit démocratique de la mondialisation du droit économique et le rôle de la société civile

Listed author(s):
  • Laurence Boy
Registered author(s):

    THE DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT OF GLOBALISED ECONOMIC LAW AND THE ROLE OF CIVIL SOCIETY The World Trade Organisation and the rules of the various multilateral and plurilateral agreements it administers, in particular the GATT and the agreements on GATS, TRIMS and TRIPS, are not only central to international trade, but the pivots of economic and legal globalisation. This is the more true as, due to the dispute settlement mechanism, the binding nature and enforcement of WTO-rules have been enhanced. The pervasive nature of globalisation, however, is not paralleled by an equally broad basis of legitimacy and of regulatory authority. In particular, as WTO and the UN are non-specialized global, but separate international organizations, issues of conflicts with primacy of fundamental rights may arise when WTO-rules are developed, applied and enforced, and so do issues of respecting matters of public interest in the applications of WTO-rules, such as considerations of the protection of the environment, public health and labor standards, etc. These issues just as the proper development, application and enforcement of WTO’s rules strictly speaking become the more important as globalization progresses, and they bring a no less intriguing issue to the fore, which is that WTO-Agreements have been negotiated by States, that the application and enforcement is a matter mainly for the States alone, and that, therefore, litigation and dispute settlement as well are a matter for Member States’ government. The persons, which are concerned, however, enterprises, consumers, the citizens in general and their associations, do not have formal standing in either the rule-making process or as regards enforcement of rules (and even on the domestic level, direct applicability of WTO-rules is an exception, and accepted only by some Members). Of course, WTO might look to citizens’ groups for advice as well as to companies. Citizens’groups and companies, as many of their supporters claim, could be the principal members of an « international civil society ». The power of NGOs has increased in a globalised world. It has to be recognised in WTO because national governments no longer have a monopoly of information compared to corporations and civil society. The spread of democratic government in poor countries, technological change and economic integrationglobalisation, have created fertile ground for the rise of NGOs. Globalisation itself has exacerbated a host of worries : over the environment, labour rights, human rights, consumer rights and so on. Democratisation and technological progress have revolutionised the way in which citizens can unite to express their disquiet. We try, here, to propose some answers to these questions.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by De Boeck Université in its journal Revue internationale de droit économique.

    Volume (Year): t. XVII (2003)
    Issue (Month): 3 ()
    Pages: 471-493

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_173_0471
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:riddbu:ride_173_0471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.