IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/repdal/redp_335_0791.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Link between Legitimacy and Response to Incentives on a Crowdwork Platform? The Foule Factory Case

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Elambert

Abstract

Using neo-institutionalist approach, crowdwork platforms can be considered as mesoinstitutions (Ménard [2014, 2018]), acting as regulators on their own labor market. As the legitimacy of a meso-institution influences the efficiency of its governance and of its incentive system (Ménard [2016]), the legitimacy of crowdwork platforms appears essential to guarantee workers? effort. This paper therefore questions the link between the legitimacy of the platform as perceived by the micro-workers and their response to the incentives put in place. Based on a multiple correspondence analysis of a questionnaire conducted with workers of a French micro-tasking platform, we build two composite indexes for the legitimacy and the strength of the incentives to test a possible correlation. Our findings show that positive legitimacy is significantly related to strong effort incentives, but that this relationship becomes more tenuous as legitimacy and the strength of response to incentives decreases. Crowdwork platforms must therefore not neglect the perception of their legitimacy if they want to secure workers? efforts and survive against other platforms.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Elambert, 2023. "What Link between Legitimacy and Response to Incentives on a Crowdwork Platform? The Foule Factory Case," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 133(5), pages 791-842.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_335_0791
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=REDP_335_0791
    Download Restriction: restricted

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique-2023-5-page-791.htm
    Download Restriction: restricted
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_335_0791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-d-economie-politique.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.