IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Quel degré de rationalité favorise la coordination des agents ?. Un exemple

  • Pierre-Alain Taillard
Registered author(s):

    The aim of this article is to study the consequences of the psychological grounded assumption that people?s judgements are biased under uncertainty on the behaviors of agents in an economy represented by a coordination game under incomplete information. I focus particularly on two biases: the avaibility heuristic and optimism. The avaibility heuristic means that when processing information agents give more weight to salient facts than otherwise informative facts. Salient information is often described as vivid as opposed to pallid information. Vivid information is easy to retreave or strike the agent?s attention like private information as opposed to public information. As a consequence, I model an agent suffering from the avaibility heuristic as conditioning his expectation only on his private information even if better, i.e., public information is available. Optimism and means that each agent believes to be cleverer than the average. As a consequence, I model an agent suffering from optimism as believing to be the only one able to forecast the behavior of others. My aim is to contrast the behaviors of agents suffering from these two biases with the behaviors of agents who have rational expectations. That is why I nevertheless maintain the assumption of consistent beliefs. I study a coordination game in incomplete information played by agents who hold these psychological expectations? formations. A coordination game has multiple equilibria that can be Pareto ranked. The selection of a specific equilibrium depends on the expectations each agent has about the behaviors of others, which are themselves conditioned on their expectations about others? behaviors. Therefore the problem of coordination is one of coordinating expectations. I add noise to the canonical coordination game and I study the consequences of these two biases on the way in which agents process information when forming their expectations, on the equilibrium of the economy. I show that when agents hold these expectations? formation, one particular equilibrium is chosen that can account for agents? mistakes. The equilibrium chosen can eventually Pareto dominate the low equilibrium of the underlying coordination game in complete information. I show that the indeterminacy of equilibria is inherent to the joint hypotheses of rationality of agents and common knowledge of rationality. In this case, the structure of the economy is reflexive: The goal of an agent is to forecast the expectations and the behavior of others? agents and they care no more about their private information.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by Dalloz in its journal Revue d'économie politique.

    Volume (Year): 116 (2006)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 23-42

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_161_0023
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:repdal:redp_161_0023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.