La perception de la pauvreté dans un monde globalisé
Relying on the World Value Survey data, this paper explores what individuals consider as the most important problems in the world in a sample of about 50 countries. The paper focuses particularly on the fact to prioritize poverty as the most important problem, as poverty constitutes an important dimension of inequalities. Differences between countries appear: the richer the country, the less poverty is considered as the most important problem. To explain these differences, two hypotheses are investigated: either these different perceptions result from different cultural and historical contexts, or from a different level of economic and social development, suggesting that all countries converge towards a unique model. At the country level, we register differences among geographical areas, largely due to the unequal degree of development. At the individual level, two results emerge. First, priority given to poverty as the most important world problem is linked with the prioritizing poverty as the most important problem in one’s own country. Second, the person’s own relative social position has also an influence: the more advantaged people prove less sensitive to poverty. Political attitudes (opinion about redistribution, ideological orientation on the left-right scale) also exert an influence: a leftist orientation or being favorable to redistribution are associated with a greater sensitivity towards poverty as a world problem. Finally, multilevel models confirm the weight of individual factors and the relatively weak impact of specific national contexts. JEL Classification codes : I30, I32, Z13.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:reofsp:reof_126_0171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.