IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

La valeur de l'évaluation des risques en situation de précaution

Listed author(s):
  • Dominique Bureau
Registered author(s):

    It is commonly admitted that the improvement of the state of scientific knowledge is a part of decision – making under scientific uncertainty. Expected-utility models are not appropriate to assess the value of such research projects, since these take place in the context of strong scientific uncertainties, and primarily aim to reduce the ambiguity between divergent probabilities scenarios. In this perspective, we examine the value of information that reduces ambiguity, for different models of preferences consistent with ambiguity aversion over probabilities. First we consider the maximum of minimum expected utility criterion. It is shown that, in this catastrophic framework, reducing ambiguity may have no value, or huge value, depending on the characteristics of the controversial probabilities and revenues. However, such a criterion seems too extreme. This value of information is then estimated for the Klibanoff et al. [2005]’s model, with smooth ambiguity preferences.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by Presses de Sciences-Po in its journal Revue économique.

    Volume (Year): 61 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 5 ()
    Pages: 875-893

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_615_0875
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:recosp:reco_615_0875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.