IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Les trois approches de Malthus pour résoudre le problème démographique

Listed author(s):
  • Donald Rutherford
Registered author(s):

    Throughout his writings, especially in the six editions of his Essay on Population, Malthus? extended discussion of his population principle ? the fundamental tendency towards divergence between population and subsistence growth rates ? suggests several solutions to the problem he defined. To clarify the nature of his theory, detailed conceptual analysis is essential. The four human roles of worker, utilitarian, procreator and consumer identified by Malthus need to be assessed to explain the behaviour of the human population. Subsistence, like human behaviour, is a complex idea. It takes different forms, ranging from basic food to luxuries, and is rendered obscure in Malthus through his use of many different expressions for it. The concept of subsistence is analysed in this article within the eighteenth century framework of the four stages of economic growth and largely uses a population model for a single country rather than for the whole world. The conclusion to this enquiry is that although Malthus admits that an advanced country is able to deal with population growth through industrial specialization and food importing, he rejects this solution in favour of an approach based on a balanced economy.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: free

    Article provided by Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED) in its journal Population.

    Volume (Year): 62 (2007)
    Issue (Month): 2 ()
    Pages: 253-280

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:cai:popine:popu_702_0253
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:popine:popu_702_0253. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.