IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/popine/popu_403_0419.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La déperdition dans la cohorte Cocon entre 2000 et 2002

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolas Razafindratsima
  • Ngoy Kishimba
  • Ngoy Kishimba

Abstract

The COCON (COhorte CONtraception) survey on contraception, unplanned pregnancy and induced abortion in France, was set up to interview by telephone a representative sample of women aged 18-44, and to follow them up annually over five years. Between 2000 and 2002, the survey sample fell in size by one third, from 2,863 to 1,912 women. This article describes this attrition process and evaluates the biases that it causes in the analyses. The attrition is due, in roughly equal proportions, to two factors: first, an inability to re-contact the women; second, refusals to be re-interviewed. It is highly selective, concerning primarily foreign women, of low educational level, young and living alone, and was responsible for modifying the structure of the sample followed up and the means for several survey variables of interest. However, the attrition has little impact on the multivariate analyses. Finally, the implications of attrition in COCON are limited as regards the biases caused, and are seen mainly as the loss of precision in the estimates due to the reduction in sample size.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolas Razafindratsima & Ngoy Kishimba & Ngoy Kishimba, 2004. "La déperdition dans la cohorte Cocon entre 2000 et 2002," Population (french edition), Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED), vol. 59(3), pages 419-448.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:popine:popu_403_0419
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=POPU_403_0419
    Download Restriction: free

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-population-2004-3-page-419.htm
    Download Restriction: free
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:popine:popu_403_0419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-population.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.