IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/inndbu/inno_pr2_0116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

La sélection des idées incrémentales et radicales : Les enseignements d’une étude de cas

Author

Listed:
  • Yassine Ininou
  • Thomas Loilier

Abstract

This article examines the way in which the ideas put forward by the employees of an industrial firm are selected. Its objective is to provide a fine and renewed understanding of the process dimension of this key stage in the management of innovation and creativity. To achieve this objective, it explores the decision-making process at work within the Bosch MoP company, combining qualitative interviews (with 38 actors in the process) and study of the argumentative interactions exchanged during 4 deliberation meetings of the innovation committee in charge of the selection. The results show first of all that the idea selection process differs in its components, organizational scope and trajectories depending on whether one is dealing with incremental or radical ideas. These two types of ideas are also the subject of specific arguments during the innovation committees in charge of deciding on their acceptance or rejection. The results also show that selection is indeed a sequenced, modular (depending on the type of ideas put forward) and mixed process, where logical-mathematical and social approaches complement each other. JEL CODE: O31

Suggested Citation

  • Yassine Ininou & Thomas Loilier, 2021. "La sélection des idées incrémentales et radicales : Les enseignements d’une étude de cas," Innovations, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 139-175.
  • Handle: RePEc:cai:inndbu:inno_pr2_0116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/load_pdf.php?ID_ARTICLE=INNO_PR2_0116
    Download Restriction: restricted

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/revue-innovations-2021-3-page-139.htm
    Download Restriction: restricted
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Creativity; Ideas Selection; Criteria; Ideas Evaluation; Argumentative Interactions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cai:inndbu:inno_pr2_0116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jean-Baptiste de Vathaire (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cairn.info/revue-innovations.htm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.