IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v68y2023i2id48-2022-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting the in vitro embryo production in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): A review

Author

Listed:
  • S Kumar

    (Laboratory of Physiology and Control of Reproduction, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil)

  • MS Chaves

    (Laboratory of Physiology and Control of Reproduction, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil)

  • AFB da Silva

    (Postgraduate Program in Veterinary Science, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil)

  • WG Vale

    (Postgraduate Program in Veterinary Science, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil)

  • STR Filho

    (Animal Reproduction Sector, Federal Rural University of the Amazon, Belém, Brazil)

  • JC Ferreira-Silva

    (Animal Reproduction Sector, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil)

  • LM Melo

    (Molecular Genetics Research Unit, University Center Fametro, Fortaleza, Brazil)

  • VJF Freita

    (Laboratory of Physiology and Control of Reproduction, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil)

Abstract

Under natural and well-managed conditions, the buffalo has good reproductive and productive indices. However, in vitro embryo production (IVEP) has been used commercially to maximise the number of elite animals. In this species, several factors (donor management, in vitro culture medium, semen, in vitro conditions, embryo transfer) still affect the IVEP results. In addition, the cost of this technique is very high for this purpose. Therefore, more studies, as well as adequate plans, are needed to achieve this objective efficiently. In this review, we discussed the current commercial status, influencing factors (in vivo and in vitro), and the progress and future challenges of IVEP in buffalo. A total of 81 references were used from 1979 to 2022. The relevant data or literature were searched using the following databases: Google, ResearchGate, Science Alert, Science Direct and PubMed, using the following keywords: buffalo oocytes/COCs, buffalo embryos, pregnancy and calving or live birth rate after embryo transfer. The best maturation, cleavage and blastocyst rates in the in vitro production of buffalo embryos were 95.8, 75.2 and 33.4%, respectively. The pregnancy and live birth rates ranged from 22.2% to 43.5% and from 15.3% to 36.5%, respectively, after the transfer of fresh embryos produced in vitro to the recipients. This review will help to contextualise IVEP in buffaloes, as well as create an adequate plan for implementing IVEP in buffaloes.

Suggested Citation

  • S Kumar & MS Chaves & AFB da Silva & WG Vale & STR Filho & JC Ferreira-Silva & LM Melo & VJF Freita, 2023. "Factors affecting the in vitro embryo production in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis): A review," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(2), pages 45-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:68:y:2023:i:2:id:48-2022-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/48/2022-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/48/2022-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/48/2022-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/48/2022-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:68:y:2023:i:2:id:48-2022-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.