IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v65y2020i5id69-2019-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative study on different field tests of ketosis using blood, milk, and urine in dairy cattle

Author

Listed:
  • MSA Faruk

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, Jeonnam, Republic of Korea)

  • B Park

    (Animal Clinic of Hongseong Naknong Nonghyup, Republic of Korea)

  • S Ha

    (Dairy Science Division, Department of Animal Resources Development, National Institute of Animal Science, Republic of Korea)

  • SS Lee

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, Jeonnam, Republic of Korea)

  • LL Mamuad

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, Jeonnam, Republic of Korea)

  • Y Cho

    (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Sunchon National University, Suncheon, Jeonnam, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study assessed the diagnostic performance of five field tests for ketosis in the blood, milk and urine in dairy cows. Samples were collected simultaneously from 102 dairy cows to determine the accuracy of the test results. The concentration of β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) in the blood was measured quantitatively by using a portable ketone test kit. The milk and urine samples were analysed semi-quantitatively using different commercial test kits and urine sticks. The animals were categorised into a subclinical ketosis (SCK) and clinical ketosis (CK) group based on the BHBA concentration in the blood. The diagnostic performance of the milk and urine test kits was compared with the blood test kit. In the blood test, out of 102 cows, 27 and 19 cows were diagnosed with SCK and CK, respectively. The percentage agreement (kappa value) for the three different milk tests and the urine test kit was 43% (κ = -0.181), 72% (κ = 0.243), 63% (κ = 0.065) and 64% (κ = 0.163), respectively, for the SCK detection, which indicates lower sensitivity. However, a strong agreement with 88% (κ = 0.612), 85% (κ = 0.505), 86% (κ = 0.528) and 91% (κ = 0.753) was observed in the three milk tests and the urine test, respectively, for the CK diagnosis, showing a higher sensitivity. For the diagnosis of the SCK and CK, all the tested kits are generally applicable for the detection of CK in dairy cattle, but caution is needed during the interpretation of the SCK data due to the low sensitivity of the milk and urine tests for the SCK detection. Furthermore, this study suggests that milk and urine samples can be used as alternatives for the diagnosis of CK in replacement of blood tests.

Suggested Citation

  • MSA Faruk & B Park & S Ha & SS Lee & LL Mamuad & Y Cho, 2020. "Comparative study on different field tests of ketosis using blood, milk, and urine in dairy cattle," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(5), pages 199-206.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:65:y:2020:i:5:id:69-2019-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/69/2019-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/69/2019-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/69/2019-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/69/2019-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:65:y:2020:i:5:id:69-2019-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.