Author
Listed:
- X.Y. Hu
(Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)
- L. Luan
(Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)
- W. Guan
(Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)
- J. Shi
(Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)
- Y.B. Zhao
(Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China)
- H.G. Fan
Abstract
This study was aimed at comparing the postoperative analgesic effects of tolfenamic acid and meloxicam in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Ovariohysterectomy was performed in 24 female dogs. All dogs were administered pre-anaesthetic medication comprised of 0.02 mg/kg i.m. acepromazine, and general anaesthesia was induced with i.v. propofol (4-6 mg/kg) and maintained with 1.5-2.0% isoflurane. Dogs were divided into three groups (n = 8). Following induction of anaesthesia, group C received 0.05 ml/kg sterile saline i.m.; group T received 4 mg/kg tolfenamic acid i.m.; group M received 0.2 mg/kg meloxicam s.c. Heart rate, respiratory rate, rectal temperature, mean arterial pressure and arterial oxygen saturation of haemoglobin were monitored intraoperatively. Pain was assessed using the short form of the Glasgow composite pain scale (SF-GCPS) by two observers who were blinded to the treatment groups; pain was assessed at the time of pre-medication (baseline), and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h after extubation. Rescue analgesia (0.2 mg/kg i.m. methadone) was administered to any dog with an SF-GCPS score of greater than or equal to six during postoperative monitoring. The pain score in group C was significantly higher compared with group T and group M at 4, 6 and 8 h, while there were no significant differences between the two treatment groups. The mean pain score in group C was also higher than that in group M at 2 h. Rescue analgesia was first administered at 4 h in group C. Rescue analgesia was required by significantly more dogs in group C (n = 8) compared with groups T (n = 0) and M (n = 1), but there was no significant difference between the two treatment groups. Thus, tolfenamic acid and meloxicam provide adequate postoperative analgesia to similar degrees over 24 h in healthy dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
Suggested Citation
X.Y. Hu & L. Luan & W. Guan & J. Shi & Y.B. Zhao & H.G. Fan, 2017.
"Tolfenamic acid and meloxicam both provide an adequate degree of postoperative analgesia in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(6), pages 333-341.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:62:y:2017:i:6:id:143-2016-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/143/2016-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:62:y:2017:i:6:id:143-2016-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.