Author
Listed:
- T. Sustrova
(Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic)
- P. Ondrackova
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- L. Leva
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- M. Kolarova
(Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic)
- P. Kulich
(Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic)
- Z. Sladek
(Mendel University, Brno, Czech Republic)
Abstract
Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium and Enterococcus cultures are increasingly used as probiotics for humans and pigs. The aim of this study was to investigate if co-cultivation of porcine and human neutrophils with probiotics can lead to increased apoptosis in vitro. Ten adult Large white pigs and 10 healthy human donors were used in this study. Neutrophils were isolated by dextran sedimentation and cultivated with and without the lactic acid bacteria Bifidobacterium bifidum, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and Enterococcus faecium for 2, 4, 24 and 48 h. Early and late apoptosis was measured using flow cytometry, and cell lysis was detected based on lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH). A significant (P < 0.05; P < 0.01) increase in apoptotic neutrophils and LDH was observed at 24 h and 48 h in vitro. All probiotics exerted their greatest effects on the early apoptosis of porcine neutrophils, while the effects of L. rhamnosus were most pronounced on late apoptosis and those of B. bifidum on LDH release of human neutrophils. The increased neutrophil apoptosis caused by probiotic bacteria can be beneficial for more efficient efferocytosis and faster resolution of inflammation and tissue regeneration. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the interaction of B. bifidum, L. rhamnosus, and E. faecium with human and porcine neutrophils leads to their apoptosis.
Suggested Citation
T. Sustrova & P. Ondrackova & L. Leva & M. Kolarova & P. Kulich & Z. Sladek, 2017.
"Effect of probiotics on the viability of porcine and human neutrophils in vitro,"
Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 62(12), pages 637-646.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:62:y:2017:i:12:id:72-2017-vetmed
DOI: 10.17221/72/2017-VETMED
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:62:y:2017:i:12:id:72-2017-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.