IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlvet/v53y2008i4id1917-vetmed.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apparent digestibility in meat-type guinea pigs as determined by total collection or by internal marker

Author

Listed:
  • P. Guevara

    (Facultad de Ciencias Pecuarias, Escuola Superior Politecnica de Chimborazo (ESPOCH), Riobamba, Ecuador)

  • T. Claeys

    (Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium)

  • G.P.J. Janssens

    (Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium)

Abstract

Six adult male meat-type guinea pigs were subjected to three subsequent digestibility trials with 100% alfalfa, 50% alfalfa and 50% sugar cane and 50% alfalfa and 50% concentrate. For each animal in each period, feed intakes were recorded and all faeces were collected and stored at -20°C until analysis. Feeds and faeces were analysed for dry matter, crude ash, crude protein, ether-extract, crude fibre and acid-insoluble ash. Coefficients of apparent digestibility were calculated according to both the total collection method and the marker method with acid-insoluble ash as internal marker. The present study suggests that acid-insoluble ash is not valid as an internal marker when looking at differences between individuals, but might be useful to demonstrate differences between diets, albeit with lack of accuracy for estimating the absolute digestibility coefficients obtained through the total collection method. Sugar cane was slightly less digestible than alfalfa in meat-type guinea-pigs.

Suggested Citation

  • P. Guevara & T. Claeys & G.P.J. Janssens, 2008. "Apparent digestibility in meat-type guinea pigs as determined by total collection or by internal marker," Veterinární medicína, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 53(4), pages 203-206.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:53:y:2008:i:4:id:1917-vetmed
    DOI: 10.17221/1917-VETMED
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/1917-VETMED.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://vetmed.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/1917-VETMED.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/1917-VETMED?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlvet:v:53:y:2008:i:4:id:1917-vetmed. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.