IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlrae/v51y2005i4id4913-rae.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Operational effects of implements on crop residues in soil tillage operations

Author

Listed:
  • J. Hůla

    (Technical Faculty, Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • R. Šindelář

    (Technical Faculty, Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • P. Kovaříček

    (Research Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

After spring barley harvest the operational effects of tillers and seed drill on spring barley residues were evaluated in two variants of cultural operations. Generally low values of soil surface coverage by crop residues after cultural operations were performed document that soil tillage and sowing did not comply with the criteria for conservation technologies - the coverage of soil surface by crop residues was lower by 30% after all cultural operations. After silage maize harvest we determined the weight of maize crop residues and coverage of soil surface by these residues after shallow tillage by a disk tiller when nine variants of the operating mode of the tiller were used. Obviously, the change in the operating mode of the tiller was able to influence the coverage of soil surface by maize residues. The evaluation of the operational effects of disc tiller on crop residues indicated some restraints of the use of this group of implements for conservation (erosion-control) technologies of soil tillage.

Suggested Citation

  • J. Hůla & R. Šindelář & P. Kovaříček, 2005. "Operational effects of implements on crop residues in soil tillage operations," Research in Agricultural Engineering, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 119-124.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:51:y:2005:i:4:id:4913-rae
    DOI: 10.17221/4913-RAE
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4913-RAE.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://rae.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/4913-RAE.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/4913-RAE?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlrae:v:51:y:2005:i:4:id:4913-rae. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.