IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpps/vpreprintid96-2023-pps.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle and conventional spray systems for the maize fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) management

Author

Listed:
  • P.S. Shanmugam

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • T Srinivasan

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • V Baskaran

    (Agricultural College & Research Institute, TNAU, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • A Suganthi

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • B Vinothkumar

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • G Arulkumar

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • S Backiyaraj

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • S Chinnadurai

    (Agricultural College & Research Institute, TNAU, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • V Somasundaram

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • N Sathiah

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • N Muthukrishnan

    (Agricultural College & Research Institute, TNAU, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • S.V. Krishnamoorthy

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • K Prabakar

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • S Douresamy

    (Agricultural College & Research Institute, TNAU, Tiruvannamalai, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • Y.S. Johnson Edward Thangaraj

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • S Pazhanivelan

    (Water Technology Centre, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • K.P. Ragunath

    (Water Technology Centre, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • R Kumaraperumal

    (Department of Remote Sensing & GIS, TNAU, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • S Jeyarani

    (Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • R Kavitha

    (Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

  • A.P. Mohankumar

    (Department of Farm Machinery and Power Engineering, TNAU, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India)

Abstract

Insecticidal interventions at critical stages of maize are an important strategy for managing invasive insect pest fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith). Conventional spraying systems cannot be used over larger areas, and the insecticide application using unmanned aerial vehicles is becoming popular among peasants. As the FAW resides inside the maize whorls, targeted insecticide application is necessary for effective management. The efficacy of (UAV) spray with different types of nozzles was compared with the conventional spray system, namely high-volume spray and Control droplet applicator. The other spray systems' droplet density, efficacy, and residues of insecticides in plants, soil and water were studied. The UAV droplet density up to 5 m swath recorded no significant variation for both nozzles. A UAV with an atomizer nozzle was as effective as a high-volume spray in reducing the FAW infestation. The residue analysis of leaf samples from the study area revealed more residues in the control droplet applicator and UAV atomizer nozzle. The per cent reduction of initial deposits in the top, middle and bottom maize leaves was least in the UAV atomizer nozzle. The insecticide residues in the study sample area were also below the detectable limit. UAV usage in maize saves time and reduces FAW damage as that of high-volume sprayers.

Suggested Citation

  • P.S. Shanmugam & T Srinivasan & V Baskaran & A Suganthi & B Vinothkumar & G Arulkumar & S Backiyaraj & S Chinnadurai & V Somasundaram & N Sathiah & N Muthukrishnan & S.V. Krishnamoorthy & K Prabakar &, . "Comparative analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle and conventional spray systems for the maize fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae) management," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:preprint:id:96-2023-pps
    DOI: 10.17221/96/2023-PPS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/96/2023-PPS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/96/2023-PPS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:preprint:id:96-2023-pps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.