IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlpps/vpreprintid65-2024-pps.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation of Two Counting Methods to Establish Rodent Densities in Crop fields

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Heroldová

    (Department of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Eva Jánová

    (Department of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
    Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic,)

  • Jan Zejda

    (Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic,)

  • Jan Šipoš

    (Department of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and Apiculture, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Josef Suchomel

    (Department of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and Apiculture, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The common vole (Microtus arvalis) is the main pest in agricultural areas of Central Europe. It is particularly important to monitor its numbers during spring, and if high numbers are detected, some form of pest management should be considered. In the Czech Republic, the number of active burrows is monitored using the burrow index, BI, which allows estimation of the total number of rodents, saves time and is easy to use. We aimed to assess the relationship between the burrow index and the relative abundance of the rodent species examined by snap trapping in crop fields. Bayesian MCMC algorithms with a zero-inflation model were used for this analysis. The positive relationship between BI and vole abundance occurred in the total sample of all fields and in alfalfa, winter wheat and barley crop fields. A positive relationship between BI and the abundance of the wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus), the second most common pest in the area, was only confirmed in barley, and this relationship was negative in winter rape. The positive influence of the degree of weed cover on BI was confirmed in the total sample and in winter rape and alfalfa, but weed cover has a negative effect on BI in barley and winter wheat. In contrast, weed cover did not affect the relative abundance of both rodent species in any of the sampled crops. The presence of shrubs and forests around the fields reduced BI in the whole sample, especially in alfalfa. The relative abundance of the voles was not affected by the presence of shrubs and forests around the crop. Still, a positive influence was confirmed for the abundances of mice in the whole sample and alfalfa. BI can be a reliable indicator of vole abundance in crops with high densities, but it is not very accurate at low densities and in crop fields rarely used by voles, such as sunflower and maize.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Heroldová & Eva Jánová & Jan Zejda & Jan Šipoš & Josef Suchomel, . "An Evaluation of Two Counting Methods to Establish Rodent Densities in Crop fields," Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:preprint:id:65-2024-pps
    DOI: 10.17221/65/2024-PPS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pps.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/65/2024-PPS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/65/2024-PPS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:preprint:id:65-2024-pps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.