Author
Listed:
- Radix Suharjo
(Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)
- Hani Anggrainy Oktaviana
(Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)
- Titik Nur Aeny
(Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)
- Cipta Ginting
(Plant Protection Department, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)
- Rachmansyah Arianto Wardhana
(PT Great Giant Pineapple, Lampung Tengah, Indonesia)
- Ariyo Nugroho
(PT Great Giant Pineapple, Lampung Tengah, Indonesia)
- Ratdiana Ratdiana
(PT Great Giant Pineapple, Lampung Tengah, Indonesia)
Abstract
Sixteen bacterial strains showing oval, convex with a white colony colour were obtained from the water-soaked lesions on the petioles and leaves of infected papaya (cv. calina) collected from a papaya field in Lampung Timur, Indonesia. The pathogenicity test showed that all the strains produced the same symptoms with those found in the field. Four representative strains were then chosen for further investigation. The phenotypic characteristics revealed that the strains resembled Erwinia mallotivora. Two representative strains were further identified using a 16SrDNA sequence analysis. The result showed that the strains were placed within the group of the type strain and the reference strains of E. mallotivora. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first finding of E. mallotivora as the causal agent of papaya crown rot disease in Indonesia. Among the sixteen plants used for the host range test, the symptom was only observed on eggplants, but not on the other fifteen plant species.
Suggested Citation
Radix Suharjo & Hani Anggrainy Oktaviana & Titik Nur Aeny & Cipta Ginting & Rachmansyah Arianto Wardhana & Ariyo Nugroho & Ratdiana Ratdiana, 2021.
"Erwinia mallotivora is the causal agent of papaya bacterial crown rot disease in Lampung Timur, Indonesia,"
Plant Protection Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 122-133.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:57:y:2021:i:2:id:123-2020-pps
DOI: 10.17221/123/2020-PPS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlpps:v:57:y:2021:i:2:id:123-2020-pps. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.