IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnljfs/v66y2020i5id42-2020-jfs.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Production potential and structural variability of pine stands in the Czech Republic: Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) vs. introduced pines - case study and problem review

Author

Listed:
  • Vilém Podrázský

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Zdeněk Vacek
  • Stanislav Vacek

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Jan Vítámvás

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Josef Gallo

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Anna Prokůpková

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Giuseppe D'Andrea

    (Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) is one of the most important tree species in Eurasia. During the past centuries, it has been extensively introduced into artificial monocultures, but is currently experiencing a number of problems related to climate change and extreme droughts. There is a large-scale disintegration of its stands and, in addition to its replacement by other native trees, it is possible to use a wide range of introduced species of the same genus. The aim of the investigation was to compare production parameters, structure and diversity of pine stands at the age of 35 years in school Arboretum of Faculty of Forestry and Wood Science in Central Bohemia (320 m a.s.l., medium rich habitats, water deficit site). Seven species of pine were compared: ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex C. Hawson), Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi Balf.), black pine (Pinus nigra J.F.Arnold), eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.), Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Douglas), Macedonian pine (Pinus peuce Griseb.) and the only native Scots pine. The results showed that significantly (P < 0.001) highest height, diameter at breast height and mean stem volume were achieved in Pinus ponderosa and P. strobus stands, while these parameters were lowest in P. peuce and P. nigra. In contrast, the lowest stand volume was calculated for P. strobus (112 m3.ha-1) due to the lower stand density, while the highest production was again in P. ponderosa (430 m3.ha-1). In terms of structural variability, the highest diversity was found in P. jeffreyi and P. peuce. The introduced pine species, especially P. ponderosa, could therefore play an important role in terms of production and economic potential and even replace native P. sylvestris on suitable sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilém Podrázský & Zdeněk Vacek & Stanislav Vacek & Jan Vítámvás & Josef Gallo & Anna Prokůpková & Giuseppe D'Andrea, 2020. "Production potential and structural variability of pine stands in the Czech Republic: Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) vs. introduced pines - case study and problem review," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(5), pages 197-207.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:66:y:2020:i:5:id:42-2020-jfs
    DOI: 10.17221/42/2020-JFS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/42/2020-JFS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://jfs.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/42/2020-JFS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/42/2020-JFS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. Ulbrichová & V. Podrázský & F. Beran & D. Zahradník & M. Fulín & J. Procházka & J. Kubeček, 2015. "Picea abies provenance test in the Czech Republic after 36 years - Central European provenances," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(11), pages 465-477.
    2. Jan Mondek & Martin Baláš, 2019. "Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco) and its role in the Czech forests," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(2), pages 41-50.
    3. M. Fabrika & J. Ďurský, 2005. "Algorithms and software solution of thinning models for SIBYLA growth simulator," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(10), pages 431-445.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sezgin Ayan & Cengiz Yücedag & Bojan Simovski, 2021. "A major tool for afforestation of semi-arid and anthropogenic steppe areas in Turkey: Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(10), pages 449-463.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tomáš Čihák & Monika Vejpustková, 2023. "Comparison of nutrient and carbon stocks in the aboveground biomass of mature silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) stands," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(8), pages 334-347.
    2. repec:caa:jnljfs:v:preprint:id:92-2023-jfs is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Pavel Brabec & Jakub Brichta & Zdeněk Vacek & Stanislav Vacek & Václav Šimůnek & Vojtěch Hájek, . "Potential of mixed Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Pinus sylvestris L. forests in lowland areas of Central Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
    4. Stanislav Vacek & Rostislav Linda & Ivo Králíček & Karel Vančura & Anna Prokůpková & Romana Prausová, 2020. "Effect of structure and dynamics of forests on the occurrence of Erythronium dens-canis," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(9), pages 349-360.
    5. Radoslav Hlavica & Zdeněk Adamec, 2023. "Development of Douglas fir merchantable stem volume model in the conditions of the Czech Republic," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(12), pages 515-524.
    6. Pavel Brabec & Jakub Brichta & Zdeněk Vacek & Stanislav Vacek & Václav Šimůnek & Vojtěch Hájek, 2023. "Potential of mixed Picea abies (L.) Karst. and Pinus sylvestris L. forests in lowland areas of Central Bohemia," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(11), pages 470-484.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnljfs:v:66:y:2020:i:5:id:42-2020-jfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.