Author
Listed:
- Iveta Pánková
(Bacteriology Department, Crop Research Institute, Praque, Czech Republic)
- Václav Krejzar
(Bacteriology Department, Crop Research Institute, Praque, Czech Republic)
- Radka Krejzarová
(Bacteriology Department, Crop Research Institute, Praque, Czech Republic)
Abstract
The susceptibility of 14 pear cultivars to the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, the causal agent of bacterial blast, was evaluated using three different methods of in vivo inoculation detached shoots inoculation in a growth chamber, and terminal shoot and blossom inoculation of potted trees in a net house in the period 2020-2022. The 20-week assessment of infection symptoms in the net house showed different dynamics of disease development depending on the inoculation method, the weather during the growing season and the susceptibility of the pear cultivars. Most of the cultivars were during the study low susceptible to pathogen and were classified in blossom, terminal as well as detached shoot susceptibility class 2. The European cultivar Kiefer was the least susceptible (susceptibility class 1) to blossom infection, the Asian cultivars Chojuro and Ya Li to terminal shoot infection, and Ya Li to detached shoot infection. The European cultivar William's was the most susceptible to all types of infection, being classified in class 3, moderately susceptible cultivars to infection of terminal shoots, and class 4, highly susceptible cultivars to infection of blossoms and detached shoots. The assessment of susceptibility of pear cultivars to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae in the net house approximated conditions as close as possible to the condition in orchards and should thus be consistent in plantings with similar environmental and weather conditions.
Suggested Citation
Iveta Pánková & Václav Krejzar & Radka Krejzarová, 2024.
"Comparison of the blossom and shoot susceptibility of European and Asian pear cultivars to Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae,"
Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 51(2), pages 85-97.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:51:y:2024:i:2:id:18-2023-hortsci
DOI: 10.17221/18/2023-HORTSCI
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:51:y:2024:i:2:id:18-2023-hortsci. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.