IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlhor/v46y2019i2id144-2017-hortsci.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stomatal anatomy and closing ability is affected by supplementary light intensity in rose (Rosa hybrida L.)

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Fanourakis

    (Giannakakis SA, Export Fruits and Vegetables, Tympaki, Greece)

  • Benita Hyldgaard

    (Department of Food Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Årslev, Denmark)

  • Habtamu Giday

    (Department of Food Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Årslev, Denmark
    Horticulture and Product Physiology Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands)

  • Isaac Aulik

    (Department of Food Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Årslev, Denmark)

  • Dimitris Bouranis

    (Plant Physiology and Morphology Laboratory, Crop Science Department, Agricultural University of Athens, Athens, Greece)

  • Oliver Körner

    (Leibniz-Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Grossbeeren, Germany)

  • Carl-Otto Ottosen

    (Department of Food Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Årslev, Denmark)

Abstract

Increasing the light level in protected cultivation of ornamental crops via supplementary lighting is critical to enhance both production and external quality especially during the periods of low light availability. Despite wide applications the effects of light intensities were not previously addressed on water loss pathways. In this study rose plants were cultivated at 100, 200 or 400 μmol/(m2.s) photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). The stomatal responsiveness to desiccation, stomatal anatomical features and cuticular transpiration were determined. Plant biomass as well as photosynthesis response to light and CO2 were also assessed. Increasing growth PPFD led to a considerable increase in plant biomass (85 and 57% for 100 to 200 and 200 to 400 μmol/(m2.s) respectively). Photosynthesis was marginally affected by increasing growth PPFD from 100 to 200 μmol/(m2.s) while a further rise to 400 μmol/(m2.s) considerably increased photosynthetic rate at high light intensities. Higher PPFD during cultivation generally led to larger stomata with bigger pores. A PPFD increase from 100 to 200 μmol/(m2.s) had a small negative effect on stomatal closing ability whereas a further rise to 400 μmol/(m2.s) had a substantial stimulatory effect. Cultivation at a PPFD higher than 100 μmol/(m2.s) led to lower rates of cuticular transpiration. In conclusion, high growth PPFD (> 200 μmol/(m2.s)) enchanced both photosynthetic and stomatal anatomical traits. High light intensity (> 200 μmol/(m2.s)) also led to a better control of water loss due to more responsive stomata and decreased cuticular permeability.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios Fanourakis & Benita Hyldgaard & Habtamu Giday & Isaac Aulik & Dimitris Bouranis & Oliver Körner & Carl-Otto Ottosen, 2019. "Stomatal anatomy and closing ability is affected by supplementary light intensity in rose (Rosa hybrida L.)," Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 46(2), pages 81-89.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:46:y:2019:i:2:id:144-2017-hortsci
    DOI: 10.17221/144/2017-HORTSCI
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/144/2017-HORTSCI.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://hortsci.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/144/2017-HORTSCI.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/144/2017-HORTSCI?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:46:y:2019:i:2:id:144-2017-hortsci. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.