Author
Listed:
- M. Pešaković
(Fruit Research Institute Čačak, Čačak, Republic of Serbia)
- S. Milenković
(Department of Fruit Protection, Faculty of Biofarming, Megatrend University Bačka Topola, Republic of Serbia)
- D. Đukić
(Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Kragujevac Čačak, Republic of Serbia)
- L. Mandić
(Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Kragujevac Čačak, Republic of Serbia)
- Ž. Karaklajić-Stajić
(Fruit Research Institute Čačak, Čačak, Republic of Serbia)
- J. Tomić
(Fruit Research Institute Čačak, Čačak, Republic of Serbia)
- N. Miletić
(Department of Food Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao Area, Spain)
Abstract
Evaluation was performed of the effect made by integrated and conventional production systems on phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity of cv. Senga Sengana strawberry grown under greenhouse conditions over two consecutive years. The experiment also involved three different types of fertilizer. The integrated production system provides significantly larger quantities of polyphenols as well as a higher antioxidant capacity, compared to values obtained using the conventional system. The investigation into total phenolics content and total antioxidant capacity, as well as individual flavonols and phenolic acids (except gallic acid) content reveals a pronounced effect of the applied biofertilizers (PGPR 1 and PGPR 2). On the other hand, applied chemical fertilizer (Multi KMg) gives the best results in terms of anthocyanins content. These results indicate that there were significant differences in phenols content among integrated and conventional production systems, as well as between biofertilizers and a chemical fertilizer.
Suggested Citation
M. Pešaković & S. Milenković & D. Đukić & L. Mandić & Ž. Karaklajić-Stajić & J. Tomić & N. Miletić, 2016.
"Phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity of integrated and conventionally grown strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.),"
Horticultural Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 43(1), pages 17-24.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:43:y:2016:i:1:id:180-2014-hortsci
DOI: 10.17221/180/2014-HORTSCI
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlhor:v:43:y:2016:i:1:id:180-2014-hortsci. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.