Author
Listed:
- Kristýna Klímová
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Kristýna Lokvencová
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Ivan Bahelka
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Kateřina Zadinová
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Roman Stupka
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Jaroslav Čítek
(Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)
Abstract
In the Czech Republic, the pig carcass classification is mandatory in slaughterhouses processing over 200 pigs weekly. As breeding practices evolve to enhance lean meat yield, it is essential to update regression equations used in classification systems. This study presents new regression models for the Fat-O-Meater II (FOM II) device, using computed tomography (CT) as the reference method. Separate equations were developed for barrows, gilts, and boars to improve the accuracy of lean meat percentage (LMC) estimation. To calibrate the CT method, 24 carcasses were selected across a range of backfat thicknesses and sexes. CT scans were performed on chilled left carcass halves, followed by manual dissection to determine the true LMC. A correction model was applied to align the CT-derived LMC with dissection results. Subsequently, 128 carcasses were measured using FOM II and CT to develop sex-specific regression equations using ordinary least squares. The models revealed sex-specific differences in prediction accuracy. Gilts achieved an R2 of 0.66 and RMSEP of 1.35; barrows had higher R2 (0.759) and greater RMSEP (1.46); boars showed the most consistent composition (R2 = 0.734, RMSEP = 1.14). Compared to the standard method, gilts and boars had slightly higher LMC (+0.03% and +0.82%), while barrows had lower LMC (-0.14%). These differences translated into economic impacts, with gains of CZK 1.23 and CZK 4.33 per gilt and boar carcass, respectively, and a loss of CZK 5.55 per barrow carcass. These results support the formulated hypotheses, and the fact that sex-specific calibration enhances classification accuracy and economic efficiency.
Suggested Citation
Kristýna Klímová & Kristýna Lokvencová & Ivan Bahelka & Kateřina Zadinová & Roman Stupka & Jaroslav Čítek, 2025.
"Estimation of lean meat percentage in pig carcass with the use of objective methods with regard to sex,"
Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(9), pages 397-403.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:70:y:2025:i:9:id:72-2025-cjas
DOI: 10.17221/72/2025-CJAS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:70:y:2025:i:9:id:72-2025-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.