IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v68y2023i8id54-2023-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamics of occurrence of defective eggs in initial laying lines of hens

Author

Listed:
  • Tomáš Kopec

    (Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Ladislav Máchal

    (Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Eva Tůmová

    (Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Zuzana Rečková

    (Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Radek Filipčík

    (Department of Animal Breeding, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to monitor the occurrence of abnormal eggs in five initial laying lines of the domestic chicken (Gallus domesticus) between 2017 and 2021. The incidence of abnormal eggs, cracks, shell-less eggs, and double-yolk eggs were examined as part of the monitoring. Also assessed was the laying intensity, which ranged from 83.7% for the Barred Plymouth Rock (BPR) B line to 96.8% for the Rhode Island Red (RIR) A line. A statistically significant relationship between the line and control year was discovered for all varieties of abnormal eggs. The highest occurrence of cracks was in the RIR B line (2.2%). The BPR A line of hens had the highest concentration of shell-less eggs (1.7%), while the RIR A line, which also had the highest laying intensity (96.8%), had the highest frequency of double-yolk eggs (1.5%). A positive trend between the intensity and the occurrence of abnormal eggs was also confirmed. The BPR B (3.4%) and BPR C (3.0%) lines, which belonged to the lines with the lowest laying intensity, had the lowest percentage of abnormal eggs. For the BPR C line, cracks (1.2%), shell-less eggs (0.9%), and double-yolk eggs (0.9%) had the lowest occurrence rates. The correlation between laying intensity and double-yolk eggs reached 0.67, and a significant positive relationship was seen. On the other hand, no association was found between the laying intensity and the prevalence of cracked or shell-less eggs. There was also a strong correlation between abnormal eggs and double-yolk eggs (0.80) and between abnormal eggs and cracks (0.73). The correlation between the total occurrence of abnormal eggs and the intensity of laying reaches a mean value of 0.41. An increase in the intensity of laying from 80% to almost 100% leads to an increase in the occurrence of abnormal eggs from 2.6% to 6.3%.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomáš Kopec & Ladislav Máchal & Eva Tůmová & Zuzana Rečková & Radek Filipčík, 2023. "Dynamics of occurrence of defective eggs in initial laying lines of hens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 68(8), pages 356-363.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:68:y:2023:i:8:id:54-2023-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/54/2023-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/54/2023-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/54/2023-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/54/2023-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:68:y:2023:i:8:id:54-2023-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.