IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v67y2022i4id3-2022-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of different inclusion levels of whole barley in feed on growth performance, carcass, and gastrointestinal traits of broiler chickens

Author

Listed:
  • Vilma Viliene

    (Institute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Asta Raceviciute-Stupeliene

    (Institute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Saulius Bliznikas

    (Institute of Animal Science, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Baisogala, Lithuania)

  • Alius Pockevicius

    (Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Monika Nutautaite

    (Institute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Vilma Sasyte

    (Dr. L. Kriaučeliūnas Small Animal Clinic, Veterinary Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The aim of the present research was to evaluate the effect of feeding graded levels of whole barley (WB) on broiler chicken growth and carcass performance, gastrointestinal morphology, and function. A total of 800 male Ross 308 broiler chickens (1-day-old) were randomly assigned to four treatment groups with four replicate pens of 50 birds each. Diets differed in their WB dosage: without WB (NO-WB); low WB amount (LOW-WB) dosages: 4% (1-7 days of age), 8% (8-21 days of age), 15% (22-35 days of age); medium WB amount (MEDIUM-WB) dosages: 6% (1-7 days of age), 12% (8-21 days of age), 20% (22-35 days of age); high WB amount (HIGH-WB) dosages: 8% (1-7 days of age) 16% (8-21 days of age), 25% (22-35 days of age). Body weight, average daily gain, and mortality of chickens did not statistically differ between treatments (P > 0.05). The feed conversion ratio was higher in the treatments diluted with WB. There were no differences in ammonia nitrogen concentration except for increased butyrate concentration in the caecum and reduced digesta viscosity in the broiler ileum in groups fed LOW-WB, MEDIUM-WB, and HIGH-WB diets (P < 0.05). The high WB amount in the diets increased Lactobacillus spp. in the ileal contents and improved ileum morphology (P < 0.05). The inclusion of graded levels of WB in the diets had no effect on carcass performance but it seemed to enhance the gastrointestinal tract development.

Suggested Citation

  • Vilma Viliene & Asta Raceviciute-Stupeliene & Saulius Bliznikas & Alius Pockevicius & Monika Nutautaite & Vilma Sasyte, 2022. "The impact of different inclusion levels of whole barley in feed on growth performance, carcass, and gastrointestinal traits of broiler chickens," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 147-156.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:67:y:2022:i:4:id:3-2022-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/3/2022-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3/2022-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/3/2022-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/3/2022-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Justin L. Sonnenburg & Fredrik Bäckhed, 2016. "Diet–microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism," Nature, Nature, vol. 535(7610), pages 56-64, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karolina Skonieczna-Żydecka & Ewa Stachowska & Dominika Maciejewska & Karina Ryterska & Joanna Palma & Maja Czerwińska-Rogowska & Mariusz Kaczmarczyk & Anna Gudan & Honorata Mruk & Barbara Świniarska , 2018. "The Digestive Health among Participants of the Woodstock Rock Festival in Poland—A Cross-Sectional Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, October.
    2. Shao-Ming Gao & Han-Lan Fei & Qi Li & Li-Ying Lan & Li-Nan Huang & Peng-Fei Fan, 2024. "Eco-evolutionary dynamics of gut phageome in wild gibbons (Hoolock tianxing) with seasonal diet variations," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    3. Zengliang Jiang & Lai-bao Zhuo & Yan He & Yuanqing Fu & Luqi Shen & Fengzhe Xu & Wanglong Gou & Zelei Miao & Menglei Shuai & Yuhui Liang & Congmei Xiao & Xinxiu Liang & Yunyi Tian & Jiali Wang & Jun T, 2022. "The gut microbiota-bile acid axis links the positive association between chronic insomnia and cardiometabolic diseases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Gertrude Ecklu-Mensah & Candice Choo-Kang & Maria Gjerstad Maseng & Sonya Donato & Pascal Bovet & Bharathi Viswanathan & Kweku Bedu-Addo & Jacob Plange-Rhule & Prince Oti Boateng & Terrence E. Forrest, 2023. "Gut microbiota and fecal short chain fatty acids differ with adiposity and country of origin: the METS-microbiome study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    5. Lucía Guadamuro & M. Andrea Azcárate-Peril & Rafael Tojo & Baltasar Mayo & Susana Delgado, 2021. "Impact of Dietary Isoflavone Supplementation on the Fecal Microbiota and Its Metabolites in Postmenopausal Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, July.
    6. Noemi Boqué & Lucía Tarro & Alice Rosi & Helena Torrell & Guillermo Saldaña & Elisa Luengo & Zeev Rachman & António Pires & Nuno Tiago Tavares & Ana Salomé Pires & Maria Filomena Botelho & Pedro Mena , 2021. "Study Protocol of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial to Tackle Obesity through a Mediterranean Diet vs. a Traditional Low-Fat Diet in Adolescents: The MED4Youth Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:67:y:2022:i:4:id:3-2022-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.