IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v65y2020i9id144-2020-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farmed at two different temperatures: Post rigor mortis changes in function of the stunning method

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella Dalle Zotte

    (Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy)

  • Anna Concollato

    (Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
    §Department of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Sciences, Section of Animal Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy Present address: Facco & C. Officine (S.P.A.), Padova, Italy)

  • Giulia Secci

    (§Department of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Sciences, Section of Animal Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy Present address: Facco & C. Officine (S.P.A.), Padova, Italy)

  • Marco Cullere

    (Department of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy)

  • Giuliana Parisi

    (§Department of Agri-Food Production and Environmental Sciences, Section of Animal Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy Present address: Facco & C. Officine (S.P.A.), Padova, Italy)

Abstract

Post rigor mortis changes of texture, chemical and sensory properties in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared at two different temperature conditions (8 and 12 °C) were examined to better understand how different stunning methods, i.e. electroshock (E) and asphyxia with carbon monoxide (CO), can influence their evolution during refrigerated storage. Seven days after rigor resolution (TRR7), considering ATP catabolites (K- and K1-values), the freshness remained well preserved regardless of the stunning method applied and water temperature. During refrigerated storage fillets from fish reared at 8 °C maintained significantly higher (P < 0.001) pH at the day of rigor resolution (TRR0), whereas at the end of the storage time (TRR7), 8 °C-reared fish showed a significantly lower pH value (P < 0.05). CO treatment was effective in ensuring a more intense red colour of the fillet and high chroma, whereas E treatment exhibited the lowest a*, b* and chroma values. The texture profile analysis showed a significant effect of the stunning method (S), water temperature (T) and S × T interaction on fillet cohesiveness. TBARS values were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in fish stunned by CO when compared to E group in the first 76 h post mortem (TRR0). At the end of the storage period (TRR7), no TBARS value difference was detected between treatments. The stunning method had a relevant impact on fillet sensory traits, revealing that CO fillets were the juiciest (P < 0.05) and presented the lowest saltiness (P < 0.05), aroma (P < 0.05) and odour (P < 0.01) intensity. Rearing temperature, instead, had a moderate effect on fillet sensory traits and indicated that the water temperature of 12 °C enhanced juiciness (P < 0.05) and tenderness (P < 0.05) attributes. Overall results suggested that CO is a suitable stunning method for trout that, coupled with 12 °C water temperature, are able to preserve fillet freshness, enhance colorimetric characteristics which are maintained during refrigerated storage, and provide desirable sensory traits.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Dalle Zotte & Anna Concollato & Giulia Secci & Marco Cullere & Giuliana Parisi, 2020. "Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) farmed at two different temperatures: Post rigor mortis changes in function of the stunning method," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(9), pages 354-364.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:65:y:2020:i:9:id:144-2020-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/144/2020-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/144/2020-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/144/2020-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/144/2020-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:65:y:2020:i:9:id:144-2020-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.