Author
Listed:
- Peter Loibl
(TUM School of Live Science Weihenstephan, Chair for Animal Nutrition, Technical University of Munich, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany)
- Wilhelm Windisch
(TUM School of Live Science Weihenstephan, Chair for Animal Nutrition, Technical University of Munich, Freising-Weihenstephan, Germany)
- Wolfgang Preißinger
(Institute for Animal Nutrition, Bavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Grub, Germany)
Abstract
Modern pig feeding systems allow the collection of highly detailed feeding data for each animal. These data enable the examination of individual feeding behaviours to assess an animal's wellbeing. As such, four different treatments ‒ undisturbed control, starving (no feed for 24 h, restrictive feeding), feed change (changes in feed composition) and social stress (exchanging of animals between the pens and short-term reduction of accessible water) ‒ were designed to simulate typical short-term disturbances in a practical stable routine. Each treatment was conducted over 2 pens with 12 animals each. Zootechnical performance and feed intake behaviour measures were assessed for each animal. Treatments did not affect zootechnical performance. Results showed that short-term disturbances did not influence feed intake behaviours, such as daily feed intake, amount of intake per feeder visit, number of daily feeder visits and daily feeding action with highest feed intake. Animals developed individual feeding patterns that persisted through artificial short-term disturbances. However, data suggested that an individual animal's behavioural pattern was strongly influenced by the group (pen) due to group dynamics among animals.
Suggested Citation
Peter Loibl & Wilhelm Windisch & Wolfgang Preißinger, 2020.
"Examination of high-resolution feed intake data of grower finisher pigs confronted with typical short-term disturbances in stable routine,"
Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(7), pages 258-267.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:65:y:2020:i:7:id:25-2020-cjas
DOI: 10.17221/25/2020-CJAS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:65:y:2020:i:7:id:25-2020-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.