IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjs/v65y2020i12id208-2020-cjas.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of SNPs from Illumina BovineSNP50K BeadChip v3 for imputation of microsatellite alleles for parentage verification and QTL reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Michaela Přibáňová
  • Daniela Schroffelová

    (Czech-Moravian Breeders' Corporation, a.s., Hradištko, Czech Republic)

  • David Lipovský

    (Czech-Moravian Breeders' Corporation, a.s., Hradištko, Czech Republic)

  • Josef Kučera

    (Czech-Moravian Breeders' Corporation, a.s., Hradištko, Czech Republic)

  • Vladimír Šteiger

    (Czech-Moravian Breeders' Corporation, a.s., Hradištko, Czech Republic)

  • Jarmila Hromádková

    (Czech-Moravian Breeders' Corporation, a.s., Hradištko, Czech Republic)

  • Lucie Němcová

    (Czech-Moravian Breeders' Corporation, a.s., Hradištko, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The present study aimed to test the possibility of avoiding expensive retesting of the whole parental generation for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to provide additional analysis of microsatellites in offspring in the transitional period and to analyse the likelihood of imputation of the International Society for Animal Genetics-recommended microsatellite markers from selected SNPs. The imputation and pedigree verification of 9 520 animals (representing 84 dairy bulls, 285 dairy cows, 3 202 beef bulls and 5 949 beef cows) were analysed by the method using 9 410 SNP haplotypes (incorporating an average of 73 SNPs per haplotype). The imputation method was confirmed to allow the parentage verification of up to 87% of the analysed animals without the need for retesting. The most problematic locus was TGLA53, with only 78% successful imputation. Seven loci (BM2113, ETH225, TGLA227, BM1824, SPS115, TGLA122 and TGLA126) had more than 90% imputing accuracy and success of imputation. The success of imputation also depends on the breed and the call rate of the test results. The highest imputation accuracy was found for the Holstein breed; the other six breeds had over 90% successful imputation rates, four breeds had imputation rates between 85.0 and 89.9%, and ten breeds (rarely bred in the Czech Republic) had imputation rates below 85.0%. A call rate of SNP tests lower than 90% indicates problems with haplotype construction and thus deterioration in the success of imputation. The analysis of a possibility of using all possible information from Illumina BovineSNP50K BeadChip v3 showed 109 SNPs encoding 51 quantitative trait loci markers. Haplotypes were designed for interpretation of the most important markers for diseases, exterior and performance. The most important markers for Holstein breeders were chosen as kappa- (variants A, B and E) and beta-casein (variants A1, A2), Holstein haplotypes affecting fertility (HH1, HH3, and HH4) and loci causing genetic defects, bovine leukocyte adhesion deficiency and deficiency of uridine monophosphate synthetase. The results estimated from bovine bead chips corresponded to the expected distribution of the incidence of these traits in the population and were verified by PCR-RFLP tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Michaela Přibáňová & Daniela Schroffelová & David Lipovský & Josef Kučera & Vladimír Šteiger & Jarmila Hromádková & Lucie Němcová, 2020. "Use of SNPs from Illumina BovineSNP50K BeadChip v3 for imputation of microsatellite alleles for parentage verification and QTL reporting," Czech Journal of Animal Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(12), pages 482-490.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:65:y:2020:i:12:id:208-2020-cjas
    DOI: 10.17221/208/2020-CJAS
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/208/2020-CJAS.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/208/2020-CJAS.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/208/2020-CJAS?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjs:v:65:y:2020:i:12:id:208-2020-cjas. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.