IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlcjg/v46y2010i3id74-2009-cjgpb.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of relationships among twelve Phyllanthus species with the use of molecular markers

Author

Listed:
  • Gyana Ranjan Rout

    (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, College of Agriculture, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, India)

  • Sunil K. Senapati

    (Regional Plant Resource Centre, Plant Biotechnology Division, Bhubaneswar, India)

  • S. Aparajita

    (Regional Plant Resource Centre, Plant Biotechnology Division, Bhubaneswar, India)

Abstract

The present investigation was undertaken to describe the relationships among twelve species of Phyllanthus collected in India by help of molecular markers. In total, 259 marker loci were assessed, out of which 249 were polymorphic revealing 96.13% polymorphism. Nei's similarity index varied from 0.35 to 0.76 for RAPD (Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA) and from 0.31 to 0.76 for ISSR marker systems. Cluster analysis by the unweighted pair group method (UPGMA) of Dice coefficient of similarity generated dendrogram with more or less similar topology for both the analyses that offered a better explanation for diversity and affinities between the species. The phylogenetic tree obtained from both RAPD and ISSR (Inter Simple Sequence Repeat) markers has divided the 12 species into two groups: group I consisting of only one species Phyllanthus angustifolius (Sw.) Sw and group II with the rest of 11 species. Basically, these results were in compliance with notable morphological characterization. The present study revealed high variation among the species of Phyllanthus and will help to identify different Phyllanthus species.

Suggested Citation

  • Gyana Ranjan Rout & Sunil K. Senapati & S. Aparajita, 2010. "Study of relationships among twelve Phyllanthus species with the use of molecular markers," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 46(3), pages 135-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:46:y:2010:i:3:id:74-2009-cjgpb
    DOI: 10.17221/74/2009-CJGPB
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/74/2009-CJGPB.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: http://cjgpb.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/74/2009-CJGPB.pdf
    Download Restriction: free of charge
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/74/2009-CJGPB?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjg:v:46:y:2010:i:3:id:74-2009-cjgpb. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.