Author
Listed:
- Filip Beňo
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemistry Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Eliška Václavíková
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemistry Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Filip Hruška
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemistry Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Nell Melisa Heráková
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemistry Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
- Rudolf Ševčík
(Department of Food Preservation, Faculty of Food and Biochemistry Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague, Czech Republic)
Abstract
Thawed meat is usually of lower quality and less expensive than chilled meat, which some dishonest people may exploit by fraudulently marketing it as chilled. This study focused on methods for detecting and distinguishing frozen meat from chilled meat. The activity of the enzyme aconitase in the eluate was determined, and the mineral cations (Na+, K+, Mg2+) as well as the concentrations of organic acids (acetic, citric, and lactic) were analysed in chilled and thawed meat stored for 7, 14, and 150 days at -18 °C. After 150 days of storage, aconitase activity increased from 47.2 ± 7.2 U.L-1 to 395.3 ± 59.2 U.L-1 in pork, from 45.8 ± 11.5 U.L-1 to 133.3 ± 31.8 U.L-1 in beef, and from 17.2 ± 8.6 U.L-1 to 143.6 ± 41.5 U.L-1 in chicken. The mineral content decreased during storage in meat samples, especially Na+ and K+ cations (P < 0.05). The results for organic acids were less conclusive. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the data confirmed a clear separation between chilled and thawed meat for all species, with a high variability of nearly 72%.
Suggested Citation
Filip Beňo & Eliška Václavíková & Filip Hruška & Nell Melisa Heráková & Rudolf Ševčík, .
"Detection of frozen-thawed beef, pork and chicken meat,"
Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
Handle:
RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:preprint:id:139-2025-cjfs
DOI: 10.17221/139/2025-CJFS
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlcjf:v:preprint:id:139-2025-cjfs. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.