IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/vpreprintid87-2024-agricecon.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological perspectives on smallholder farmers' choice of climate change adaptation strategies and productivity nexus in Southwest, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Adetomiwa Kolapo

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

  • Akeem Abiade Tijani

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

  • Seyi Olalekan Olawuyi

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa)

  • Adeyera James Kolapo

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Extension, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria)

  • Temitope Oluwaseun Ojo

    (Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria)

  • Nolwazi Zanele Khumalo

    (Department of Agriculture, University of Zululand, Richards Bay, South Africa)

  • Khalid. Mohamed Elhindi

    (Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)

  • Hazem Kassem

    (Department of Agricultural Extension and Rural Society, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt)

Abstract

In recent pasts, high priority has been placed on encouraging the implementation of various climate change adaptation techniques to adapt to the disastrous effects of climate change. Like in other countries affected by climate change, Nigerian farmers were also encouraged by governmental and non-governmental organisations to implement techniques for adapting to climate change impact. In this study, we use a psychological approach to investigate how a mix of socioeconomic and psycho-cognitive factors affect smallholder farmers' decisions about various climate change adaptation strategies and the consequent impact of the adoption of adaptation strategies on crop yield. Following the theory of planned behaviour (TPB), the adoption decision of farmers was modelled using the partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) and the ordered probit model. The impact of adopting adaptation strategies on productivity was evaluated using multinomial endogenous switching regression (MESR). The MESR helps to address endogeneity issues that might arise as a result of inconsistencies in the behavioural responses of the farmers. Our result indicates that psycho-cognitive factors like intentions and personal norms significantly predicted the number of climate change adaptation strategies the farmers ultimately embraced and implemented on their farms. We also found that the smallholder farmers' yield and income were most significantly impacted by the adoption of land restoration as a climate change adaptation strategy. The findings will assist in the design of more effective policy instruments to remove adoption hurdles as well as crafting tailored extension services that resonate with the realities of the farmer and thus help foster behavioural change.

Suggested Citation

  • Adetomiwa Kolapo & Akeem Abiade Tijani & Seyi Olalekan Olawuyi & Adeyera James Kolapo & Temitope Oluwaseun Ojo & Nolwazi Zanele Khumalo & Khalid. Mohamed Elhindi & Hazem Kassem, . "Psychological perspectives on smallholder farmers' choice of climate change adaptation strategies and productivity nexus in Southwest, Nigeria," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:preprint:id:87-2024-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/87/2024-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/87/2024-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/87/2024-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:preprint:id:87-2024-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.