IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/caa/jnlage/vpreprintid46-2025-agricecon.html

Sustainability performance evaluation of tropical fruit supply chain in Indonesia using the best-worst method

Author

Listed:
  • Anisa Aprilia

    (Agricultural Socio-Economics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia)

  • Syafrial

    (Agricultural Socio-Economics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia)

  • Djoko Koestiono

    (Agricultural Socio-Economics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia)

  • Fitria Dina Riana

    (Agricultural Socio-Economics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia)

  • Silvana Maulidah

    (Agricultural Socio-Economics Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang City, Indonesia)

Abstract

Studies on the sustainability assessment of supply chain performance in tropical fruit still have limitations, whereas similar studies are more widespread in the manufacturing sector. This study aims to assess the sustainability performance of the tropical fruit supply chain in Indonesia. Performance evaluations were conducted for three producer organisations of tropical fruit with members ranging from 70 to 200 people in Banyuwangi Regency, the largest production centre in Indonesia. This study proposes a new approach, the best-worst method (BWM), to prioritise supply chain performance criteria derived from the SCOR (Supply Chain Operations Reference) model based on assessments by experts managing producer organisations. In the SCOR model, environmental and social criteria are added, resulting in seven criteria for evaluating supply chain performance, which include reliability, responsiveness, agility, cost, asset management, GreenSCOR, and social. Thus, the integration of BWM and SCOR can ensure higher consistency and reliability than traditional methods for assessing sustainable supply chain performance. The results revealed that reliability is the most important criterion for supply chain performance, which shows how important the maintenance of product quality is. In contrast, agility received the lowest score, indicating that there is a need to improve performance with respect to responding to high demand, managing safety stocks, and overtime in the shipping process. Moreover, this study gives a glimpse into the importance of evaluating sustainability performance for the tropical fruit sector, having perishable characteristics and great contributions to rural development. Hence, this study provides a solid practical guide for decision-makers in assessing the sustainable supply chain of tropical fruits in Indonesia.

Suggested Citation

  • Anisa Aprilia & Syafrial & Djoko Koestiono & Fitria Dina Riana & Silvana Maulidah, . "Sustainability performance evaluation of tropical fruit supply chain in Indonesia using the best-worst method," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 0.
  • Handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:preprint:id:46-2025-agricecon
    DOI: 10.17221/46/2025-AGRICECON
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://agricecon.agriculturejournals.cz/doi/10.17221/46/2025-AGRICECON.html
    Download Restriction: free of charge

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17221/46/2025-AGRICECON?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:caa:jnlage:v:preprint:id:46-2025-agricecon. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivo Andrle (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cazv.cz/en/home/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.