IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/but/manage/v6y2007i1p151-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The relation between the substantial law and procedural law in defending subjective rights and legitimate interests

Author

Listed:
  • Petronela Adriana Cernat

Abstract

Taking into account that the Romanian Constitution mentions the state of law and constitutional democracy, concomitantly specifying the essential values- human dignity, citizens' rights and freedoms, the free development of human personality, justice and political pluralism- defended by the domestic legal order, it seems of a real practical interest to notice the concrete means established in order to protect the above mentioned values. As it has been mentioned before, the contentious administrative represents one of the most efficient ways under which the values constitutionally affirmed are guaranteed and defended. The contentious administrative basically answers the old question: Quis custodiet custodes?, question that comprises one of the most difficult obstacles against the state of law actualization: to find the most efficient procedural ways for the state bodies able to use, directly or indirectly, the coercion force in order to make the citizens observe the laws, to be in their turn under the situation to observe the same laws. As the contentious administrative represents the courts of law activity meant to settle the conflicts whereas at least one of the parties is a public authority, we will try, while evoking procedural aspects, procedural means available for someone prejudiced by a public authority, to stress the weight of the procedural rules in guarantying and defending effectively the citizens' rights and legitimate interests.

Suggested Citation

  • Petronela Adriana Cernat, 2007. "The relation between the substantial law and procedural law in defending subjective rights and legitimate interests," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 6(1), pages 151-165, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:but:manage:v:6:y:2007:i:1:p:151-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://manager.faa.ro/download/522_624.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://manager.faa.ro/en/article/The-relation-between-the-substantial-law-and-procedural-law-in-defending-subjective-rights-and-legitimate-interests~522.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:but:manage:v:6:y:2007:i:1:p:151-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cosmin Catalin Olteanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faaubro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.