IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bus/jphile/v14y2021i1-2n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I)

Author

Listed:
  • Fr Petre Comşa

    (Faculty of Theology, Valahia University, Târgoviște (Romania))

  • Costea Munteanu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Bucharest (Romania); Romanian Institute for Free Enterprise, Bucharest)

Abstract

Many today’s scientists think that religion can never come to terms with science. In sharp contrast to the widespread opinion, the authors of this paper consider that historically scientific reasoning and religious belief joined hands in their effort to investigate and understand reality. In fact, the current divorce between science and religion is nothing else than the final outcome of a gradual long-term, and deliberately assumed process of science secularization of science. However, especially during the last decades, we have all been equally confronted with the advance of a new concern over the fact that contemporary scientists have been approaching an area of investigation that had been usually addressed by the theological thought. This recent development has generated an emerging new field of investigation of Science and Religion within modern scientific epistemology.Against this background, the purpose of this paper is three-fold: firstly, to briefly emphasize that one of the defining dimensions of the dialogue between science and religion is given by the discontinuity, in which, the knowledge acquired through scientific reasoning is placed in relation to the divinely revealed knowledge; secondly, to argue that another defining dimension of the dialogue consists in the hierarchical harmony mediating the encounter between the two, thus transgressing the discontinuity and making the dialogue between theology and science possible and viable; and thirdly, to advocate the idea that the apodictic method (based on antinomic logic) can successfully structure such a dialogue.

Suggested Citation

  • Fr Petre Comşa & Costea Munteanu, 2021. "The apodictic method and the dialogue between theology and science (I)," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 14(1-2), pages 136-176, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bus:jphile:v:14:y:2021:i:1-2:n:5
    DOI: 10.46298/jpe.8665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jpe.episciences.org/8665/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.46298/jpe.8665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46298/jpe.8665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    apodictic method; discontinuity relationship; antinomic logic; patristic teaching; economic science; [SHS.PHIL]Humanities and Social Sciences/Philosophy; [SHS.RELIG]Humanities and Social Sciences/Religions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bus:jphile:v:14:y:2021:i:1-2:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Cojanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.