IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bsa/jtaken/v7y2021i1p19-37id554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the development of performance audit methodology in the supreme audit institution: The case of Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Nico Andrianto
  • Iwan Purwanto Sudjali
  • R. Luki Karunia

Abstract

Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan (BPK), or The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia, has introduced performance audits intensively since public sector audit reforms were initiated in 2001. However, the implementation of performance audits still faces several obstacles. This study examines the development of the performance audit methodology in BPK, which can be divided into three stages: before the revitalization of BPK in 2006, the initial development of performance audits during 2006-2010, and the maturity of the implementation of performance audits since 2011. This study concludes that several key factors have affected the implementation of performance audits at BPK, including the development of audit guidelines, the dynamics of medium-term government planning, the focus of the BPK’s Management, and assistance provided by other supreme audit institutions (SAI). To address new realities and challenges in the future, more sophisticated performance audit methods need to be adopted by BPK, such as big data analytics, the adoption of governance audits, and employing public policy analysis. Without adopting such methods, the institutionalization of ​​effective performance audits might not be achieved in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Nico Andrianto & Iwan Purwanto Sudjali & R. Luki Karunia, 2021. "Assessing the development of performance audit methodology in the supreme audit institution: The case of Indonesia," Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, vol. 7(1), pages 19-37.
  • Handle: RePEc:bsa:jtaken:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:19-37:id:554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jurnal.bpk.go.id/index.php/TAKEN/article/view/554/138
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bsa:jtaken:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:19-37:id:554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Selvia Vivi Devianti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jurnal.bpk.go.id/index.php/TAKEN/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.