IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bsa/jtaken/v11y2025i1p105-121id1913.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Competency assessment in fraud detection at BPK: Challenges and enhancements

Author

Listed:
  • Dadang Sukma
  • Ratna Wardhani

Abstract

Public concerns have been raised regarding the audits conducted by the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan or BPK), the supreme audit institution, which often issues unqualified opinions despite the increasing number of corruption cases. Internally, BPK recognizes this issue as a critical risk that must be mitigated to preserve public trust. BPK must maintain its competence and safeguard public funds. This case evaluates auditors’ competency levels, identifies internal factors supporting their competence, and examines BPK’s initiatives for improving fraud detection skills. Using survey, interview, and document review data, this case study assesses competency according to BPK standards. It investigates internal factors through the auditor's code of ethics and reviews performance reports to evaluate fraud detection skills. Our study finds that BPK auditors possess strong fraud detection skills. Second, the key internal factors strengthening fraud detection include competence and professional due care. Third, BPK has introduced limited education, training, and CFE/CFrA certification policies. Senior fraud detection auditors report feeling more competent due to their increased training, experience, and access to certifications. This study employs novel internal standards, self-assessment surveys, and interviews to analyze fraud detection proficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Dadang Sukma & Ratna Wardhani, 2025. "Competency assessment in fraud detection at BPK: Challenges and enhancements," Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia, vol. 11(1), pages 105-121.
  • Handle: RePEc:bsa:jtaken:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:105-121:id:1913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jurnal.bpk.go.id/TAKEN/article/view/1913
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bsa:jtaken:v:11:y:2025:i:1:p:105-121:id:1913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Selvia Vivi Devianti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://jurnal.bpk.go.id/index.php/TAKEN/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.