IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/brc/journl/v50y2020i4p5-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Development Strategies And Policies Is Federalism Better From Economic Point Of View?

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Georgeta, Ailinca

    (Scientific researcher 3rd degree, "Victor Slavescu" Centre for Financial and Monetary Research, Bucharest, The House of Romanian Academy, Calea 13 Septembrie no. 13, Romania)

Abstract

Everything we knew to be well-defined economically, politically and socially before COVID-19 seems like a thing of the past. The pandemic has swept all countries of the world, and Europe and especially the European Union makes no difference. Thus, this article aims to investigate empirically, through quarterly data, before and during the pandemic, whether federalism offers a better economic and social response compared to the unitary state regime, analyzing in tandem the realities of three federal states (Germany, Belgium and Austria) with developments of three states with other political regimes of the EU28.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Georgeta, Ailinca, 2020. "Regional Development Strategies And Policies Is Federalism Better From Economic Point Of View?," Management Strategies Journal, Constantin Brancoveanu University, vol. 50(4), pages 5-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:50:y:2020:i:4:p:5-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.strategiimanageriale.ro/papers/200401.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    federalism; stabilization; crisis; EU28;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • E63 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Comparative or Joint Analysis of Fiscal and Monetary Policy; Stabilization; Treasury Policy
    • Z18 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Public Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:brc:journl:v:50:y:2020:i:4:p:5-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan MICUDA (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.univcb.ro/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.